Appeal hearing listed. Appellant's counsel cited age-related difficulties and requested substitution and one-month time, which the respondent did not object to.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-190/MUM/2008
Smt. Sushma Shantilal Nahar & Ors. … Appellants FPA-FE-214/MUM/2008 Smt. Sushma Shantilal Nahar & Ors. … Appellants Versus The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Shri Viraj Kadam, Advocate For the respondent : Mrs. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant Shri Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 17.01.2019
FPA-FE-190 & 214/MUM/2008
Learned counsel for the appellant expressed his difficulty in getting any information as the appellant is very old and there are issues of communicating with her. However, he assured that he would be filing an application for substitution and sought one month’s time. Learned counsel for the respondent does not object considering that this is a old case and the age of the appellant.
List the substitution application as well as the COD application on 27th March, 2019. No further adjournments.
(Ananya Ray) Member New Delhi, 17th January, 2019 ‘A’ FPA-FE-190 & 214/MUM/2008 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
Smt. Sushma Shantilal Nahar & Ors.
The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
