FPA-FE-131/HYD/2011 of Shri T.V. Madhusudhan Rao v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
ATFPFPA-FE-131/HYD/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Shri T.V. Madhusudhan Rao V/s The Special…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| (1) FPA-FE-131/HYD/2011 Shri T.V. Madhusudhan Rao |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (1) FPA-FE-56/HYD/2014 | ||
| Shri Gollapudi Venu | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (1) FPA-FE-57/HYD/2014 | ||
| Shri M. Srikant | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (2) FPA-FE-58/HYD/2014 | ||
| M/s. Promark Infotech (Pvt.) Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (1) FPA-FE-59/HYD/2014 | ||
| Shri Madhukar Mandar Patil | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … | Respondent |
¶3
| Advocates/Authorized Re | presentatives who appeared |
|---|---|
| For the Appellants | : None |
| For the respondent | : Mrs. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant |
| Mr. Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant | |
| FPA-FE-131/HYD/2011 & FPA-FE-56-59/HYD/2014 |
Page 1 of 2 |
¶4
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Shri T.V. Madhusudhan Rao
- appellant
Shri Gollapudi Venu
- appellant
Shri M. Srikant
- appellant
M/s. Promark Infotech (Pvt.) Ltd.
- appellant
Shri Madhukar Mandar Patil
- respondent
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court