Listing order where the arguing counsel for the respondent was unavailable. The tribunal directed the respondent to file a written synopsis by the next date and listed the matters for a future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) FPA-FE-34/BNG/2014 Shri Nemi Chand … Appellant / Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
(2) FPA-FE-11/BNG/2015 Shri B.M. Rakesh … Appellant / Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Kirit Javali, Advocate Ms. Priya Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant For Shri Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 22.04.2019
FPA-FE-34/BNG/2014 & FPA-FE-11/BNG/2015
The arguing counsel on behalf of the respondent is not available. The appellant has already filed the written synopsis. Let the respondent be filed the same by the next date.
List on 7th October, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
New Delhi, 22nd April, 2019
‘D’
FPA-FE-34/BNG/2014 & FPA-FE-11/BNG/2015
Page 1 of 1
Shri Nemi Chand
Shri B.M. Rakesh
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
