FPA-7/BOM/2005 of Tabrez Mohd. Dossa v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
ATFPFPA-7/BOM/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single member G.C. Mishra could not decide the Fair Practice Appeal cases because his tenure expired before the matter was reserved for orders. The matter was ordered to be heard afresh by list on 5 February 2020.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| FPA-4/BOM/2005 Abida Mohd. Dossa |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| FPA-5/BOM/2005 Mohd. Yaseen Mohd. Dossa |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-6/BOM/2005 | ||
| Arafat Haroon Merchant | … | Appellant |
| FPA-7/BOM/2005 | ||
| Tabrez Mohd. Dossa | … | Appellant |
| FPA-8/BOM/2005 | ||
| Tabrez Mohd. Dossa | … | Appellant |
| FPA-9/BOM/2005 | ||
| Shahnawaz M. Dossa | … | Appellant |
| & | ||
| FPA-10/BOM/2005 | ||
| Shahnawaz M. Dossa | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Mumbai |
… |
Respondent |
| [ Advocates/Authorized Representative |
s who appeared | |
| For the appellants : | Mohd. Shahbaz, | Adv. (Proxy Counsel) |
| For the respondent : |
Shri Stanley Jos Inspecting Office |
eph, r |
| CORAM | ||
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA : |
MEMBER | |
| ORDER 12.09.201 |
9 |
¶3
FPA-4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10/BOM/2005
¶4
It is found that the matter was reserved for orders on 18.07.2018.
¶5
The tenure of Hon’ble Member who had heard the appeal has expired on 23.08.2019. Order not passed.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Abida Mohd. Dossa
- appellant
Mohd. Yaseen Mohd. Dossa
- appellant
Arafat Haroon Merchant
- appellant
Tabrez Mohd. Dossa
- appellant
Shahnawaz M. Dossa
- respondent
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court