FPA-77/LKW/1996 of Shankar P. Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Case brief
What is this about?
Small order directing appellants to file a comprehensive chart regarding appeal numbers, names, substitution petitions, and status within a specified time, treating such compliance as a final opportunity.
What did the court decide?
Direction to file a comprehensive chart detailing appeal numbers, appellant names, substitution petition numbers, and current status.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-77/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-93/LKW/2013 (Sub) |
||
|---|---|---|
MP-18/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-19/LKW/2014 (COD) In |
||
| FPA-73/LKW/1996 | ||
| Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (2) MP-94/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-20/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-21/LKW/2014 (COD) In |
||
| FPA-74/LKW/1996 | ||
| Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (3) MP-92/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In |
||
| FPA-75/LKW/1996 | ||
| Vikas Singh Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (4) MP-79/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-95/LKW/2013 (Sub) |
||
| MP-22/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-23/LKW/2014 (COD) In |
||
| FPA-76/LKW/1996 | ||
| Shankar P. Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (5) MP-80/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-96/LKW/2013 (Sub) |
||
| MP-24/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-25/LKW/2014 (COD) In |
||
| FPA-77/LKW/1996 | ||
| Shankar P. Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997 |
Page 1 of 5 |
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal, Vikas Singh Jaiswal, Shankar P. Jaiswal, Vishal Singh Jaiswal, Durga P. Jaiswal, Akash Jaiswal, Shanker Prasad Jaiswal
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Coram
Ananya Ray
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court