FPA-73/LKW/1996 of Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow
ATFPFPA-73/LKW/1996
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal V/s The Competent…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| (1) MP-77/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-93/LKW/2013 (Sub) |
||
|---|---|---|
MP-18/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-19/LKW/2014 (COD) In |
||
| FPA-73/LKW/1996 | ||
| Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (2) MP-94/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-20/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-21/LKW/2014 (COD) In |
||
| FPA-74/LKW/1996 | ||
| Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (3) MP-92/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In |
||
| FPA-75/LKW/1996 | ||
| Vikas Singh Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (4) MP-79/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-95/LKW/2013 (Sub) |
||
| MP-22/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-23/LKW/2014 (COD) In |
||
| FPA-76/LKW/1996 | ||
| Shankar P. Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (5) MP-80/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-96/LKW/2013 (Sub) |
||
| MP-24/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-25/LKW/2014 (COD) In |
||
| FPA-77/LKW/1996 | ||
| Shankar P. Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997 |
Page 1 of 5 |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal
- appellant
Vikas Singh Jaiswal
- appellant
Shankar P. Jaiswal
- appellant
Vishal Singh Jaiswal
- appellant
Durga P. Jaiswal
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court