This order records an adjournment of multiple appeals filed under the PMLA because the respondent's former counsel is no longer appearing and new counsel could not be engaged. The hearing was listed for October 2018 but remains open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| FPA-PMLA-971/CHD/2015 | |
|---|---|
| S. K. Sawhney … |
Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-972/CHD/2015 |
|
| G.S. Sawhney … |
Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3454/CHD/2015 Misc | |
| FPA-PMLA-963/CHD/2015 | |
| Rajinder Kr. Mittal … |
Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-964/CHD/2015 | |
| Munish Kumar … |
Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-965/CHD/2015 | |
| Vineet Goyal … |
Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-966/CHD/2015 | |
| Lal Chand … |
Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-967/CHD/2015 | |
| Mukesh Mittal … |
Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-968/CHD/2015 | |
| Praveen Kumar … |
Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3455/CHD/2015 Misc FPA-PMLA-969/CHD/2015 |
|
| Shri Ram Dharmarth Trush (Morinda) … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … | Respondents |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : | Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate (only for appeal no. 967/2015) |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : | Mrs. S.S. Satyam, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
| ORDER 19.04.2018 |
FPA-PMLA-963-969 & 971-972/CHD/2015
On the last date, it was submitted from the side of the Enforcement Directorate that new counsel would be engaged for the respondent in place of
FPA-PMLA-963-969 & 971-972/CHD/2015
Page 1 of 2
Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate who is no more appearing for the respondent. Even today there is no information from the side of the respondent. At the request of Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate, the matter is adjourned for appointment of new counsel for the respondent. No further adjournment would be granted to the respondent on this ground.
Hon’ble Chairman is not available due to his engagement in the matter pertaining to Intellectual Property Appellate Board at Mumbai.
List on 10th October, 2018.
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 19th April, 2018
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-963-969 & 971-972/CHD/2015
Page 2 of 2
S. K. Sawhney
G.S. Sawhney
Rajinder Kr. Mittal
Munish Kumar
Vineet Goyal
Lal Chand
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
