Disposed

FPA-PMLA-829/MUM/2015 of N.K. Proteins Limited v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

ATFP7 Mar 2018FPA-PMLA-829/MUM/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellate tribunal listed several connected forfeiture proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 for further consideration, granting liberty to file replies and rejoinders.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to respondent to file reply within six weeks and appellants to file rejoinder upon receipt. Matters listed for further consideration.

FPA-PMLA-829/MUM/2015 of N.K. Proteins Limited v/s The Deputy… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2018)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1.	FPA-PMLA-1029/MUM/2015 N.K. Industries Ltd	… Appellant
2.	MP-PMLA-1658/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-879/MUM/2015
	N.K. Industries Ltd	… Appellant
3.	MP-PMLA-1585/MUM/2015 (I.R.) FPA-PMLA-829/MUM/2015
	N.K. Proteins Limited	… Appellant
4.	MP-PMLA-3950/MUM/2017 (I.R.) MP-PMLA-855/MUM/2015
	M/s Banpal Oil Chem Pvt. Ltd.	… Appellant
5.	MP-PMLA-3088/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1617/MUM/2017
	Edelweiss Housing Finance Ltd.	… Appellant
6.	MP-PMLA-1748/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-909/MUM/2015
	Sonal Patel	… Appellant
7.	MP-PMLA-1749/MUM/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-910/MUM/2015
	N.K. Proteins Ltd.	… Appellant
8.	MP-PMLA-1750/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-911/MUM/2015
	N.K. Industries Ltd	… Appellant
9.	FPA-PMLA-806/MUM/2015
	M/s Genex Infratech Ltd.	… Appellant
10.	FPA-PMLA-807/MUM/2015
	M/s Genex Polyfab Ltd.	… Appellant
11.	FPA-PMLA-817/MUM/2015
	M/s Spincot Textiles Pvt. Ltd.	… Appellant
12.	FPA-PMLA-647/MUM/2015

¶3

Page 1 of 3

¶4

FPA-PMLA-1029,879,829,855,909,910,911,806,807 817,647,648,982,1031,1030/MUM/2015 & FPA-PMLA-617/MUM/2017

¶5

Aastha Minmet India Pvt. Ltd.

¶6

… Appellant

¶7

13.	FPA-PMLA-648/MUM/2015
	Mohit Aggarwal	… Appellant
14.	MP-PMLA-1881/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-982/MUM/2015
	Narain Garh Sugar Milk Ltd.	… Appellant
15.	MP-PMLA-2536/MUM/2016 (stay) MP-PMLA-2005/MUM/2015 (Exm.) FPA-PMLA-1031/MUM/2015
	Bharat Foods & Agro Produces	… Appellant
16.	MP-PMLA-2003/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1030/MUM/2015
	Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency	… Appellant

¶8

Versus

¶9

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

¶10

… Respondent

¶11

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶12

For the appellant no. 1 : Shri Suryakant Singla, Advocate For the appellant no. 2 : Davinder Bagia, Advocate For the appellant no. 3 : Sh. Sahil Jaggi, Advocate For the appellant no. 4 : Shri Pragnesh M. Gandhi, Advocate For the appellant no. 5 to8 : Sh. Rohit Mahajan, Advocate For the appellant no. 9 &10 : Sh. Jaiveer Shergill, Advocate For the appellant no. 11 : Sh. R.K. Mishra, Advocate For the appellant no. 12&13 : Ms. Neha Singh, Advocate For the appellant no. 14 &15 : Mr. Zorawar Singh, Advocate For the appellant no. 16 : Ms. Shubham M. Advocate For the respondent : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER

¶13

ORDER

¶14

07.03.2018

¶15

FPA-PMLA- 1029, 879, 829, 855, 909, 910, 911, 806, 807, 817, 647, 648,982,1031,1030/MUM/2015 &FPA-PMLA-617/MUM/2017

¶16

Page 2 of 3

¶17

FPA-PMLA-1029,879,829,855,909,910,911,806,807 817,647,648,982,1031,1030/MUM/2015 & FPA-PMLA-617/MUM/2017

¶18

These are the connected matters, which are listed for further

¶19

consideration.

¶20

In few of the matters reply has not been filed by the respondent.

¶21

In appeal no. FPA-PMLA806&807/MUM/2015, the learned counsel have challenged the proceedings u/s 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act-2002 before the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Harayana at Chandigarh and also to set aside the order dt. 28^th December, 2014.

¶22

The counsel for the appellant has stated that the proceedings for these two appeals have been stayed till the next date of hearing by the Hon’ble High Court. The said appeals are listed on 18^th April, 2018.

¶23

Under these circumstances, the said two appeals as well as other connected appeals are listed on 9^th August, 2018.

¶24

In the meantime, respondent is allowed to file the reply in pending appeals in which reply have not been filed within six weeks from today. Liberty is also granted to the appellants to file the rejoinder since the reply is received.

¶25

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶26

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶27

New Delhi, 7^th March, 2018

¶28

‘s’

¶29

Page 3 of 3

¶30

FPA-PMLA-1029,879,829,855,909,910,911,806,807 817,647,648,982,1031,1030/MUM/2015 & FPA-PMLA-617/MUM/2017

FPA-PMLA-829/MUM/2015 of N.K. Proteins Limited v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-829/MUM/2015 of N.K. Proteins Limited v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases