Admitted FPA-PMLA-827/MUM/2015. Granted respondent six weeks to file reply. Appellant may file rejoinder within four weeks. Listed for January 15, 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2546/MUM/2015 (Mics) MP-PMLA-2122/MUM/2015 (Mics) &
FPA-PMLA-827/MUM/2015
Yashovardhan Birla … Appellant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Advocate Mr. Mudit Jain, Advocate Mr. Vinit Virmani, Advocate Mr. Shivansh Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Naveen Kumar Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
04.10.2018
FPA-PMLA-827/MUM/2015
Reply has not been filed. Counsel for the respondent seeks more time to file the reply. The request is not opposed by the learned counsel for the appellant. One more opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the same within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 15th January, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi,
04th October, 2018
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-827/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 1
Yashovardhan Birla
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
