FPA-PMLA-819/AHD/2015 of Fazaleumer Aziz Pothiwala v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Case brief
What is this about?
Fazaleumer Aziz Pothiwala V/s The Deputy…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-4950/AHD/2018 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-819/AHD/2015 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Fazaleumer Aziz Pothiwala | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-4951/AHD/2018 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-820/AHD/2015 |
||
| Jafar Mohamed Hasanfatta | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-4952/AHD/2018 (Misc) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-821/AHD/2015 | ||
| Ahmed Mohamed Hasanfatta | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-4953/AHD/2018 (Misc) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-822/AHD/2015 | ||
| Samir Godil | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-4954/AHD/2018 (Misc) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-823/AHD/2015 | ||
| Afroz Mohamed Hasanfatta | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-4955/AHD/2018 (Misc) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-824/AHD/2015 | ||
| Foziya Samir Godil | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-4956/AHD/2018 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-1048/AHD/2015 |
||
| Ahmed Mohamed Hasanfatta | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Pankaj Kumar & Mr. Akash Songi Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 05.10.2018
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Fazaleumer Aziz Pothiwala, Jafar Mohamed Hasanfatta, Ahmed Mohamed Hasanfatta, Samir Godil, Afroz Mohamed Hasanfatta, Foziya Samir Godil
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · October
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-819/AHD/2015
- Topic
- Narcotics (NDPS)
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court