FPA-PMLA-779/LKW/2014 of Shyam Sunder Jaiswal v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
ATFPFPA-PMLA-779/LKW/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Shyam Sunder Jaiswal V/s The Joint Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. MP-PMLA-2790/LKW/2016 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-2031/LKW/2015 & FPA-PMLA-541/LKW/2013 Shri Shyam Sunder Jaiswal … |
Appellant |
|---|---|
| 2. MP-PMLA-3569/LKW/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-2791/LKW/2016 (Misc.) & |
|
FPA-PMLA-544/LKW/2013 Shri Ram Prasad Jaiswal … |
Appellant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-1409/LKW/2015 (I.O.) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-779/LKW/2014 | |
| Shyam Sunder Jaiswal … |
Appellant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-1412/LKW/2015 (I.O.) & |
|
FPA-PMLA-780/LKW/2014 Shyam Ganga Builders Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| 5. MP-PMLA-1415/LKW/2015 (I.O.) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-781/LKW/2014 Shri Murli Manohar Jaiswal … |
Appellant |
| 6. MP-PMLA-1418/LKW/2015 (I.O.) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-782/LKW/2014 Shri Pritam Jaiswal … |
Appellant |
| 7. MP-PMLA-3570/LKW/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1422/LKW/2015 (I.O.) & |
|
FPA-PMLA-773/LKW/2014 |
|
| Shri Ram Prasad Jaiswal … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared | |
| For the appellants : Shri Gurmehar Advocate |
S. Sistani, |
¶3
FPA-PMLA-541, 542/LKW/2013 & FPA-PMLA-773,779 to 782/LKW/2014
¶4
Page 1 of 2
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Shyam Sunder Jaiswal
- respondent
Joint Director
Coram
AI extract
MANMOHAN SINGH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · November
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-779/LKW/2014
- Topic
- Money Laundering
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court