FPA-PMLA-773/LKW/2014 of Ram Prasad Jaiswal v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
ATFPFPA-PMLA-773/LKW/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Ram Prasad Jaiswal V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. MP-PMLA-1409/LKW/2015 (Interim Orders) FPA-PMLA-779/LKW/2014 |
|
|---|---|
| Shyam Sunder Jaiswal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-1412/LKW/2015 (Interim Orders) FPA-PMLA-780/LKW/2014 |
|
| Shyam Ganga Builders Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-1415/LKW/2015 (Interim Orders) FPA-PMLA-781/LKW/2014 |
|
| Murli Manohar Jaiswal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-1418/LKW/2015 (Interim Orders) FPA-PMLA-782/LKW/2014 |
|
| Pritam Jaiswal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| & | |
| 5. MP-PMLA-3570/LKW/2017 (Misc) MP-PMLA-1422/LKW/2015 (Interim Orders) FPA-PMLA-773/LKW/2014 |
|
| Ram Prasad Jaiswal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appe |
Respondent ared |
| For the Appellants : None |
|
| For the Respondent : Ms. Sanja On behalf |
na Rajput, Advocate of Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMA |
N |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER |
¶3
ORDER 20.03.2018
¶4
FPA-PMLA-779-782/LKW/2014 & FPA-PMLA-773/LKW/2014
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Shyam Sunder Jaiswal
- appellant
Shyam Ganga Builders Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
Murli Manohar Jaiswal
- appellant
Pritam Jaiswal
- appellant
Ram Prasad Jaiswal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · March
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-773/LKW/2014
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court