FPA-PMLA-769/CHD/2014 of Uco Bank v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh & others
ATFPFPA-PMLA-769/CHD/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
UCO Bank V/s The Deputy Director Directorate…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. FPA-PMLA-764/CHD/2014 South India Bank |
… | Appellant/Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| 2. MP-PMLA-1358/CHD/2015 (U/s 151) FPA-PMLA-769/CHD/2014 |
||
| UCO Bank | ||
| 3. MP-PMLA-1441/CHD/2015 (U/s 151) FPA-PMLA-761/CHD/2014 |
||
| Punjab National Bank | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. FPA-PMLA-766/CHD/2014 | ||
| Bank of Baroda | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 5. FPA-PMLA-1737/CHD/2017 | ||
| The Branch Manager, South India Bank | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh & others Advocates/Authorized Representatives who |
… app |
Respondents eared |
| For the appellant no. 1 &5 : |
Mr | . Shashank Mishra, Advocate |
| For the appellant no. 2 : |
Ad | vocate appeared |
| For the appellant no. 3 : |
Sh | ri Nadim, Advocate |
| For the appellant no. 4 : | Sh. | Narender Singh, Advocate |
| For the Respondent no. 1 : Sh. |
N.K. | Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHA |
IRM | AN |
¶3
ORDER
¶4
17.09.2018
¶5
FPA-PMLA-764, 769 ,761, 766/CHD/2014 & FAP-PMLA-1737/CHD/2017
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
South India Bank
- appellant
UCO Bank
- appellant
Punjab National Bank
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- appellant
The Branch Manager, South India Bank
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · September
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-769/CHD/2014
- Topic
- Money Laundering
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court