Disposed

FPA-PMLA-752/DLI/2014 of M/s G2 Corporate Service Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

ATFP24 Jul 2018FPA-PMLA-752/DLI/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In multiple Prevention of Money Laundering Act proceedings, the Appellate Tribunal allowed the Respondent (Directorate of Enforcement) to be represented by an Inspecting Officer during hearings. The matter was also re-dated for re-hearing due to the resignation of a bench member.

What the court decided

AI extract

FPA-PMLA-752/DLI/2014 of M/s G2 Corporate Service Pvt. Ltd. v/s… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2018)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

(1) FPA-PMLA-751/DLI/2014
M/s Alpha Avenue Pvt. Ltd.	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi	…	Respondent
(2) MP-PMLA-1332/DLI/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-752/DLI/2014
M/s G2 Corporate Service Pvt. Ltd.	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi	…	Respondent
(3) FPA-PMLA-753/DLI/2014
M/s Gilchrist Investment Pvt. Ltd.	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi	…	Respondent
(4) FPA-PMLA-754/DLI/2014
M/s Alpha Villas Pvt. Ltd.	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi	…	Respondent
(5) FPA-PMLA-755/DLI/2014
M/s Suguni Construction Pvt. Ltd.	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi	…	Respondent
(6) FPA-PMLA-673/DLI/2014
Nimmagadda Prasad	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi	…	Respondent

¶3

FPA-PMLA-751-755 & 673/DLI/2014

¶4

Page 1 of 2

¶5

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶6

For the appellants : Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Advocate Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Mohd. Faraz, Advocate Mr. B. S. Gandhi, Inspecting Officer CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN

¶7

ORDER 24.07.2018

¶8

FPA-PMLA-751-754/DLI/2014 & FPA-PMLA-673/DLI/2014

¶9

Re-notify on 19^th September, 2018 at 2.30 p.m. as the learned Counsel for the respondent seeks time. The Hon’ble Member has resigned who had earlier heard the matter while sitting with Chairman. The matters are to be re-heard.

¶10

The learned Counsel for the respondent states that the appearance of the Inspecting Officer, Shri B.S. Gandhi is necessary. Under these circumstances, he is allowed to be present on all the dates with regard to the above mentioned matters.

¶11

Copy of the order be given ‘ Dasti’ to both the parties.

¶12

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶13

New Delhi, 24^th July, 2018 ‘r’

¶14

FPA-PMLA-751-755 & 673/DLI/2014

¶15

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-752/DLI/2014 of M/s G2 Corporate Service Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-752/DLI/2014 of M/s G2 Corporate Service Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases