The Appellate Tribunal on 16th March, 2018, noted the absence of a written synopsis filed by the appellant in matter FPA-PMLA-708/LKW/2014 and listed the case for a subsequent hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2038/LKW/2015 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-1323/LKW/2014 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1274/LKW/2014 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-708/LKW/2014
Tathagat Shikasha Samiti … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Vinay Prakash, Advocate For the respondent : Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Advocate for Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 16.03.2018
FPA-PMLA-708/LKW/2014
Written synopsis has not been filed. Counsel for the appellant seeks
some more time to file the written synopsis.
List on 14th September, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 16th March, 2018
‘A’ FPA-PMLA-708/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
Tathagat Shikasha Samiti
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
MANMOHAN SINGH
ANANYA RAY
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
