FPA-PMLA-68/ AHD/2010 of Ms. Yuti Dushyant Dalal v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
ATFPFPA-PMLA-68/ AHD/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Ms. Yuti Dushyant Dalal V/s The Deputy…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| (1) MP-PMLA-1669/AHD/2015 (u/s 35) MP-PMLA-986/AHD/2014 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-66/ AHD/2010 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Shri Dushyant Natwarlal Dalal | … | Appellant / Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad |
… | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-987/AHD/2014 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-67/ AHD/2010 |
||
| Smt. Puloma Dushyant Dalal | … | Appellant / Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad |
… | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-988/AHD/2014 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-68/ AHD/2010 |
||
| Ms. Yuti Dushyant Dalal | … | Appellant / Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad |
… | Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-989/AHD/2014 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-69/ AHD/2010 |
||
| Ms. Aashni Dushyant Dalal | … | Appellant / Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad |
… | Respondent |
| (5) MP-PMLA-990/AHD/2014 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-70/ AHD/2010 |
||
| Ms. Gita Shishir Rokadia | … | Appellant / Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad |
… | Respondent |
¶3
FPA-PMLA-66-71/AHD/2010
¶4
Page 1 of 2
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Dushyant Natwarlal Dalal
- appellant
Puloma Dushyant Dalal
- appellant
Yuti Dushyant Dalal
- appellant
Aashni Dushyant Dalal
- appellant
Gita Shishir Rokadia
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court