Appellants requested re-notification of various proceedings. The single judge order, dated 3 July 2018, directed re-notification of FPA-PMLA-66-71/AHD/2010 on 2 November 2018.
Directed re-notification of FPA-PMLA-66-71/AHD/2010 on 2nd November 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-1669/AHD/2015 (u/s 35) MP-PMLA-986/AHD/2014 (u/s 35) |
||
|---|---|---|
| FPA-PMLA-66/ AHD/2010 | ||
| Shri Dushyant Natwarlal Dalal | … | Appellant / Applicant |
| MP-PMLA-987/AHD/2014 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-67/ AHD/2010 |
||
| Smt. Puloma Dushyant Dalal | … | Appellant / Applicant |
| MP-PMLA-988/AHD/2014 (u/s 35) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-68/ AHD/2010 | ||
| Ms. Yuti Dushyant Dalal | … | Appellant / Applicant |
| MP-PMLA-989/AHD/2014 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-69/ AHD/2010 |
||
| Ms. Aashni Dushyant Dalal | … | Appellant / Applicant |
| MP-PMLA-990/AHD/2014 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-70/ AHD/2010 |
||
| Ms. Gita Shishir Rokadia | … | Appellant / Applicant |
| MP-PMLA-991/AHD/2014 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-71/ AHD/2010 |
||
| Ms. Smita Ajit Shah | … | Appellant / Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Mansi Sood, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 03.07.2018
FPA-PMLA-66-71/ AHD/2010
At the request of the appellant re-notify on 2nd November, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 3rd July, 2018. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-66-71/AHD/2010
Page 1 of 1
Shri Dushyant Natwarlal Dalal
Smt. Puloma Dushyant Dalal
Ms. Yuti Dushyant Dalal
Ms. Aashni Dushyant Dalal
Ms. Gita Shishir Rokadia
Ms. Smita Ajit Shah
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
