Single-member bench dismissed six appeals filed under FEMA, PMLA and related Acts for non-prosecution, noting consistent absence of appellants since November 2017 despite ample opportunities to appear.
All six appeals were dismissed for non-prosecution after consistent non-appearance by appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT Act AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-PMLA-50/PAT/2010 Anosh Ekka … |
Appellant |
|---|---|
| 2. FPA-PMLA-159/LKW/2011 Anosh Ekka … |
Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1979/LKW/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-160/LKW/2011 Smt. Menon Ekka … |
Appellant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-1980/LKW/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
FPA-PMLA-161/LKW/2011 Ibrahim Ekka … |
Appellant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-1981/LKW/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
FPA-PMLA-164/LKW/2011 M/s. Vedika Datamatics (P) Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| 5. MP-PMLA-1982/LKW/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-165/LKW/2011 | |
| M/s. Ekka Constructions Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| 6. MP-PMLA-1983/LKW/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
FPA-PMLA-166/LKW/2011 M/s. Motorist Inn (P) Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| 7. MP-PMLA-1984/LKW/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-327/LKW/2012 Giddyon Ekka … |
Appellant |
| 8.MP-PMLA-1985/LKW/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
FPA-PMLA-328/LKW/2012 |
|
| Jay Kant Bara … |
Appellant |
| 9. MP-PMLA-1985/LKW/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-328/LKW/2012 Jay Kant Bara … |
Appellant |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared | |
| For the appellants : None |
|
| FPA-PMLA-50/PAT/2010, |
Page 1 of 2 |
| FPA-PMLA-159-161,164-166/LKW/2011, & FPA-PMLA-327-328/LKW/2012 |
For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate
CORAM MS. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 07.09.2018
FPA-PMLA-50/PAT/2010, FPA-PMLA-159-161,164-166/LKW/2011 & FPA-PMLA-327-328/LKW/2012
No one appears on behalf of the appellants. It seems that the appellant have not been appearing consistently as and when the case is fixed for hearing.
In a similar appeal of the same appellants, the two Member Bench of this Tribunal has observed that the appellants are not appearing since November, 2017. It appears that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeals. Enough opportunities have already been given to the appellants to appear but they do not seem to be interested.
Accordingly, all the above six appeals are dismissed for nonprosecution.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 7th September, 2018 M
FPA-PMLA-50/PAT/2010, FPA-PMLA-159-161,164-166/LKW/2011, & FPA-PMLA-327-328/LKW/2012
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether these six appeals by non-prosecuting appellants stand to be dismissed.
Anosh Ekka & others
State
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
