List appeal for 25th January, 2019 in case FPA-PMLA-2597/DLI/2018 filed against notice under Section 8(4) PMLA, 2002 under Section 26 Act. Stay application interim order passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT Act AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5066/DLI/2018 U.H. MP-PMLA-5567/ DLI /2018 Exem. MP-PMLA-5068/ DLI /2018 Stay FPA-PMLA-2597/ DLI /2018 M/s. Tristar Enterprises
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Sh. Arun Kumar Agarwal & Sh. Vipin Garg, Advocates |
|---|---|
| For the respondent CORAM |
: Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 23.10.2018
FPA-PMLA-2597/ DLI /2018
Fresh appeals have been filed under Section 26 of Prevention of Money Launder Act, 2002 against the order dated 17th September, 2018.
The respondent issued the notice u/s 8(4) of the Act and thereafter, the appellant mentioned the matter seeking the stay of operation of the said facts. The interim protection was passed on 11th October, 2018. The reply to the appellant be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant. Rejoinder be filed within four weeks thereafter. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date of hearing. Interim order passed on 11th October, 2018 shall continue.
List the appeal on 25th January, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 23rd October, 2018 M FPA-PMLA-2597/DLI/2018
Page 1 of 1
4 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Tristar Enterprises
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
