Disposed

FPA-PMLA-2543/PTN/2018 of Shri Rajendra Kumar v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

ATFP20 Sept 2018FPA-PMLA-2543/PTN/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal filed under section 26 PMLA against notices following section 8(4) orders. Court dismissed immediate interim prayer regarding property lock, noted respondents offer to deposit charges, and fixed reasoning of both sides with 8-week deadline.

What did the court decide?

Notice issued to respondent to file reply within six weeks; stay application listed for October 4, 2018.

FPA-PMLA-2543/PTN/2018 of Shri Rajendra Kumar v/s The Deputy… — Narcotics (NDPS) | ATFP (2018)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

(1) MP-PMLA-4938/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2542/PTN/2018
Dr. Pradeep Kumar	…	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Patna	…	Respondent
(2) MP-PMLA-4939/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2543/PTN/2018
Shri Rajendra Kumar	…	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Patna	…	Respondent
(3) MP-PMLA-4940/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2544/PTN/2018
Nand Lal HUF	…	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Patna	…	Respondent

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the appellant	: Shri Anshuman Sinha, Advocate
For the respondent	: Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER

¶5

ORDER 20.09.2018

¶6

MP-PMLA-4938/PTN/2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2542/PTN/2018, MPPMLA-4939/PTN/2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2543/PTN/2018, MPPMLA-4940/PTN/2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2544/PTN/2018

¶7

The fresh appeal has been filed under section 26 of the Prevention

¶8

of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 3^rd August, 2018.

¶9

FPA-PMLA-2542, 2543, 2544/PTN/2018

¶10

Page 1 of 2

¶11

Issue notice to the respondent. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent seeks time to file the reply. Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.

¶12

List these appeals on 8^th February, 2019.

¶13

The learned counsel for the appellant is pressing for interim order. His submission is that after issuing the notice under section 8(4), at his back, the respondent has put its lock. The appellant intends to reside in the said property for the residential purposes. The learned counsel for the respondent states that appellant is agreeable to deposit the user and occupation charges till the appeal is finally decided. The learned counsel for the respondent states that she will take the instructions as well as file the reply within one week.

¶14

List the stay application on 4^th October, 2018.

¶15

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶16

(G.C. Mishra)

¶17

Member

¶18

New Delhi, 20^th September, 2018 ‘d’

¶19

FPA-PMLA-2542, 2543, 2544/PTN/2018

¶20

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-2543/PTN/2018 of Shri Rajendra Kumar v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-2543/PTN/2018 of Shri Rajendra Kumar v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases