The Appellate Tribunal received an appeal filed under Section 26 of the PMLA against an order of the Adjudicating Authority. The respondent accepted notice and sought time to file a reply.
Time granted to respondent to file reply within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-4914/DLI/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4915/DLI/2018 (Exem.) &
FPA-PMLA-2531/DLI/2018
Sh. Barkha Bimal Agarwal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Sh. Bahul Kalra, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Shilpi S. Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 10.10.2018
FPA-PMLA-2531/DLI/2018
The present appeal has been filed u/s 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 24th July, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority.
Issue notice. Ms. Shilpi S. Satyam accepts, counsel for the respondent the notice and seeks time to file the reply. Let the reply be filed within four weeks.
List on 15th November, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 10th October, 2018 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-2531/DLI/2018
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Barkha Bimal Agarwal
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
