Appeal before the Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002. Registry adjourned hearing for lack of reasons to believe file from Adjudicating Authority, issuing remainder for next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4906/DLI/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4907/DLI/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-4908/DLI/2018 (Misc.)
&
FPA-PMLA-2529/DLI/2018
Shri CBN Reddy … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : | Mr. Arjun Dewan, Advocate Ms. Anupama Kumar, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : | Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate |
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 22.10.2018
FPA-PMLA-2529/DLI/2018
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. One final opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the same within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 25th February, 2019.
The file from the office of the Adjudicating Authority has not been received containing the reasons to believe. Registry will issue the remainder for the next date of hearing so that the reasons to believe be examined at the time of hearing of the appeal.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
New Delhi, 22nd October, 2018 ‘AS’ FPA-PMLA-2529/DLI/2018
Page 1 of 1
CBN Reddy
Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
