Appeals pending before the PMLA Appellate Tribunal listed for hearing in February 2019. The tribunal refused to proceed due to missing records from the Adjudicating Authority and granted the respondent six weeks to file replies containing reasons to believe.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-4856/DLI/2018 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-2499/DLI/2018 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Shri Karti P. Chidambaram | … | Applicant/Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| 2. MP-PMLA-4857/DLI/2018 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-2500/DLI/2018 |
||
| V. Murali | … | Applicant/Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| 3. MP-PMLA-4858/DLI/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4859/DLI/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2501/DLI/2018 |
||
| S. Bhaskaraman | … | Applicant/Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| 4. MP-PMLA-4860/DLI/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4861/DLI/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2502/DLI/2018 |
||
| Ms. J.D. Vinula | … | Applicant/Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| 5. MP-PMLA-4866/DLI/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4867/DLI/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2505/DLI/2018 |
||
| M/s. Chess Global Advisory Services | … | Applicant/Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| 6. MP-PMLA-4868/DLI/2018 (Misc.) | ||
MP-PMLA-4869/DLI/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2506/DLI/2018 |
||
| M/s. Chess Global Advisory Services | … | Applicant/Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Assistant Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi | … | Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-2499-2502/DLI/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2505-2508/DLI/2018
Page 1 of 3
7. MP-PMLA-4870/DLI/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4871/DLI/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2507/DLI/2018 Shri R. Balachandran … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi … Respondent 8. MP-PMLA-4872/DLI/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4873/DLI/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2508/DLI/2018 M/s. Kayce Foodes Pvt. Ltd. … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants Nos. 1, 2 & 5-7 : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Advocate Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advocate Mr. Akshat Gupta, Advocate For the Appellants Nos. 3, 4 & 8 : Mr. Arjun Dewan, Advocate Ms. Anupama Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Sonia Mathur, Senior Advocate Mr. Naveen Kumar Matta, Advocate Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate Ms. Noor Rampal, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
22.10.2018
FPA-PMLA-2499-2502/DLI/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2505-2508/DLI/2018
Replies in the above mentioned appeals have not been filed. One more opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the same within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinders by the next date.
Both the parties are also allowed to file the written synopsis.
& FPA-PMLA-2505-2508/DLI/2018
FPA-PMLA-2499-2502/DLI/2018
Page 2 of 3
List on 25th February, 2019.
The files from the office of the Adjudicating Authority have not been received containing the reasons to believe. Registry will issue the remainder for the next date of hearing so that the reasons to believe be examined at the time of hearing of the appeals.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 22nd October, 2018
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2499-2502/DLI/2018
& FPA-PMLA-2505-2508/DLI/2018
Page 3 of 3
Karti P. Chidambaram
V. Murali
S. Bhaskaraman
J.D. Vinula
Chess Global Advisory Services
R. Balachandran
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
