FPA-PMLA-2394/CHN/2018 of S. Siddique Raja v/s The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Case brief
What is this about?
No appearance by the appellants; proxy counsel stated arguing counsel unavailable. Bench adjourned proceedings to next date of hearing.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4617/CHN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-4618/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4619/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4620/CHN/2018 (Exem.) & FPA-PMLA-2392/CHN/2018 R.R. Granites … Appellant MP-PMLA-4621/CHN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-4622/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4623/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4624/CHN/2018 (Exem.) & FPA-PMLA-2393/CHN/2018 P. Rajesekaran … Appellant MP-PMLA-4625/CHN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-4626/CHN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4627/CHN/2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2394/CHN/2018 S. Siddique Raja … Appellant Versus The Joint Director, … Respondent Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
| Advocates/Authorized Represen | tatives who appeared |
|---|---|
| For the Appellant : | Shri Priyadarshini, Advocate on behalf of Shri S. Nithin, Advocate & Ms. Arunima Singh, Advocate |
| For the Respondent : |
Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY : |
MEMBER |
| FPA-PMLA-2392-2394/CHN/2018 | Page 1 of 2 |
ORDER
22.11.2018
FPA-PMLA-2392-2394/CHN/2018
No one appears on behalf of the appellant. Proxy counsel for the appellant states that the arguing counsel is not available. It is seen that on the last occasion also, they did not come. They are cautioned to be present during the next date of hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.R. Granites
- appellant
P. Rajesekaran
- appellant
S. Siddique Raja
- respondent
Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court