Listing order in an appeal against a preventive action order. The respondent is granted two weeks to file a reply and the appellant is permitted to submit a list of dates and synopsis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4525/DLI/2018 Stay MP-PMLA-4526/DLI/2018 Exem FPA-PMLA-2327/DLI/2018 Manyank Jain, SMS IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Ajay Khanna, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 27.08.2018
FPA-PMLA-2327/DLI/2018
Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to the
respondent to file the reply within two weeks.
List on 17th September, 2018.
The counsel for the appellant is allowed to file the list of dates and
written synopsis by the next date.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 27th August, 2018
‘K’
Page 1 of 1
FPA-PMLA-2327/DLI/2018
Manyank Jain, SMS IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
