This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-4437/AHD/2018 Stay MP-PMLA-4438/AHD/2018 Exem. |
||
|---|---|---|
| MP-PMLA-4439/AHD/2018 COD | ||
| FPA-PMLA-2289/AHD/2018 | ||
| Ramesh Jagubhai Patel @ Michael | ... | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-4440/AHD/2018 Stay | ||
| MP-PMLA-4441/AHD/2018 Exem. | ||
| MP-PMLA-4442/AHD/2018 COD | ||
| FPA-PMLA-2290/AHD/2018 | ||
| Damania Enterprises | ... | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-4443/AHD/2018 Stay | ||
| MP-PMLA-4444/AHD/2018 Exem. | ||
| MP-PMLA-4445/AHD/2018 COD | ||
| FPA-PMLA-2291/AHD/2018 | ||
| Sai Enterprises | ... | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-4446/AHD/2018 Stay | ||
| MP-PMLA-4447/AHD/2018 Exem. | ||
| MP-PMLA-4448/AHD/2018 COD | ||
| FPA-PMLA-2292/AHD/2018 | ||
| Bhanuben Ramesh Patel | ... | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-4449/AHD/2018 Stay | ||
| MP-PMLA-4450/AHD/2018 Exem. | ||
| MP-PMLA-4451/AHD/2018 COD | ||
| FPA-PMLA-2293/AHD/2018 | ||
| Sai Bar & Restaurant | ... | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-4452/AHD/2018 Stay | ||
| MP-PMLA-4453/AHD/2018 Exem. | ||
| MP-PMLA-4454/AHD/2018 COD | ||
| FPA-PMLA-2294/AHD/2018 | ||
| Sai Wines | ... | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Mr. Jayant Sud, Sr. Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Mohit D. Ram, Advocate | ||
| Mr. Bhagirath Patel, Advocate Mr. Bakul Jain Advocate |
||
| For the respondent | : | Mohd. Faraz, Advocate |
FPA-PMLA-2289-2293/AHD/2018
Page 1 of 2
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
05.09.2018
FPA-PMLA-2289-2293/AHD/2018
Reply is not on record. Mr. Faraz, Advocate submits that reply is ready and he would be filing the same in the registry during the course of the day. Copy of the same has been handed over to the appellant’s counsel who seeks time to file the rejoinder within four weeks. Written synopsis be filed by both parties by the next date. Mr. Faraz, Advocate informed that cost has been paid.
List on 27th November, 2018.
Counsel for the respondent is also requested to take the instruction from his client in view of the order passed on 30th May, 2018.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 5th September, 2018.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-2289-2293/AHD/2018
Page 2 of 2
Ramesh Jagubhai Patel @ Michael and others
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
