Listed case where reply to condonation delay was absent; listing tied to September 14, 2018. No substantive decision on merits.
Operative order listing matter after noting absence of reply to delay application. No disposition on merits of the PMLA applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4407/JP/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-4408/JP/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4409/JP/2018 (Exem.)
&
FPA-PMLA-2269/JP/2018
The Jaipur Head, HDFC Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur & Ors. … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Advocate appeared. For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
26.07.2018
FPA-PMLA-2269/JP/2018 & MP-PMLA-4408/JP/2018 (Stay)
Reply to the application for condonation of delay has not been filed.
Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 14th September, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 26th July, 2018
‘S’
FPA-PMLA-2269/JP/2018
Page 1 of 1
The Jaipur Head, HDFC Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
MANMOHAN SINGH
G. C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
