An interim hearing filed under Section 26 of the PMLA where the appellant sought recusal of the Adjudicating Authority. The order lists the matter for hearing and notes that the respondent did not have a copy of the appeal, but does not render a decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEYLAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4405/DLI/2018 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-4406/DLI/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2268/DLI/2018
Sh. Karti P. Chidambaram
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Sh. Dayan Drishnan, Sr. Adv. With Sh. Arshdeep Singh, Advocate Sh. N.R.R. Arun Natarajan, Advocate Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advocate Sh. Akshat Gupta, Advocate Sh. Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 14.05.2018
MP-PMLA-4405/DLI/2018 (U.H.) & FPA-PMLA-2268/CHN/2018
The present appeal has been filed u/s 26 of PMLA against the order dt. 12th March, 2018 passed in O.C. 831/2017 by the Adjudicating Authority.
It appears from the record that copy of the appeal was served to the respondent on 7th May, 2018. However, Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate appeared on behalf of the respondent submits that he does not have the copy of appeal today.
FPA-PMLA-2268/CHN/2018 Page 1 of 2
At request, list on 28th May, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
14th May, 2018
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-2268/CHN/2018 Page 2 of 2
Karti P. Chidambaram
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
