Appeals were admitted for review of stay orders under PMLA. Liberty was granted to the respondents to reply within six weeks. Adjournment was listed.
Time granted to respondent to file reply within six weeks; adjournment to 30th October 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP- PMLA-4399/BBS/2018 Stay FPA-PMLA-2257/BBS/2018 Krushna Chandra Das … Appellant 2. MP- PMLA-4400/BBS/2018 Stay FPA-PMLA-2258/BBS/2018 Misc. Rasmita Das … Appellant 3. MP- PMLA-4496/BBS/2018 Stay MP- PMLA-4497/BBS/2018 Stay FPA-PMLA-2317/BBS/2018 Ms. Rasmita Nath … Appellant 4. MP- PMLA-4498/BBS/2018 Stay FPA-PMLA-2318/BBS/2018 Shri Sangramjit Nath … Appellant
Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bhubaneswar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Shri Prakash Chandra Sethi, Advocate ( for 1 & 2). Shri Sidharatha, Adv (for 3&4) For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 03.07.2018
FPA-PMLA-2257-2258 & 2317-2318/BBS/2018
Fresh appeals have been filed under Section 26 of PMLA Act, 2002 against the impugned order dated 4th April, 2018. Alongwith the appeal, the application for stay has also been filed. The learned counsel for the appellants states that the appellant has also received the notice under Section 8(4) for taking possession of immovable property. Counsel for the respondent seeks time to file the reply in the appeal as well as in the stay application. Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy
FPA-PMLA-2257-2258 & 2317-2318/BBS/2018
Page 1 of 2
to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinders within four
weeks thereafter.
List on 30th October, 2018.
As agreed no coercive steps shall be taken by the respondent against the appellant’s attached property but they shall not alienate, dispose or create any third party interest directly or indirectly in the said properties.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 3rd July, 2018
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-2257-2258 & 2317-2318/BBS/2018
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to admit appeals filed for stay orders under the PMLA.
Whether to issue time for filing replies and advance copies of pleadings.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Krushna Chandra Das
Rasmita Das
Rasmita Nath
Sangramjit Nath
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bhubaneswar
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
