Appeals filed in separate proceedings were listed for hearing. Respondent counsel accepted notice seeking six weeks to file reply, with rejoinder permitted four weeks later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP- PMLA-4387/AHD/2018 FPA-PMLA-2247/AHD/2018 |
Stay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Mansukhabhai Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4388/AHD/2018 |
Stay |
|
| FPA-PMLA-2248/AHD/2018 | ||
| Mansukh Shah HUF | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4389/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2249/AHD/2018 | ||
| Sushilaben Mansukhbhai Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4390/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2250/AHD/2018 | ||
| Dixit Shah HUF | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4391/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2251/AHD/2018 | ||
| Dixit Mansukhbhai Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4392/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2252/AHD/2018 | ||
| Varsha Dixit Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4393/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
FPA-PMLA-2253/AHD/2018 |
||
| Purvesh Mansukh Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4394/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2254/AHD/2018 | ||
| Ruchirani Purvesh Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP- PMLA-4395/AHD/2018 | Stay | |
| FPA-PMLA-2255/AHD/2018 | ||
| Purvesh Shah HUF | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, A | hemdabad … |
Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri R.K. Handoo, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| Shri Aditya & Mr. Manish Shukla Advocates |
||
| For the respondent | : | Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate |
FPA-PMLA-2247-2255/AHD/2018
Page 1 of 2
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
03.07.2018
FPA-PMLA-2247-225/AHD/2018
Above mentioned appeals have been filed against the order dated 1st March, 2018. Issue notice to the counsel for the respondent. Mr. Sharma, Advocate accepts the notice. He seeks six weeks time to file the reply. Let the same be done within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 17th October, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 3rd July, 2018. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-2247-2255/AHD/2018
Page 2 of 2
Dr. Mansukhabhai Shah
Mansukh Shah HUF
Sushilaben Mansukhbhai Shah
Dixit Shah HUF
Dixit Mansukhbhai Shah
Varsha Dixit Shah
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
