The Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for decision. It notes the arguing counsel for the appellant is unavailable and records the respondent's submission regarding possession of property before proceeding to record its order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4811/DLI/2018 (Misc) MP-PMLA-4352/DLI/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2226/DLI/2018
M/s. Mishail Packers and Printers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Appellants Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant-2 : Mr. Shilesh Kumar, in person For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 30.10.2018
FPA-PMLA-2226/DLI/2018
The arguing counsel on behalf of the appellant is not available.
List on 28th November, 2018.
Counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has
issued the letter to the appellant to take the possession of 10% of the property.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 30th October, 2018
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-2226/DLI/2018
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Mishail Packers and Printers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi
Justice Manmohan Singh
Shri G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
21 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
