The Tribunal allowed filing of replies on record despite lack of rejoinder and permitted parties to file written synopses.
Replies taken on record; rejoinders to be filed within four weeks; written synopses allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4313/DLI/2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2210/DLI/2018
M/s. Ahmed Joo Rare Jewels … Appellant and Objects D’art Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Anurag Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| MP-PMLA-4372/DLI/2018 (A.D.) & |
||
| FPA-PMLA-2207/DLI/2018 | ||
| Mr. Balchand Choraria | … Appellant | |
| FPA-PMLA-2337/DLI/2018 | ||
| Ms. Mita Choraria | … Appellant |
|
| FPA-PMLA-2338/DLI/2018 Ms. Nikita Choraria |
… Appellant |
|
| FPA-PMLA-2339/DLI/2018 | ||
| Ms. Ankita Choraria | … Appellant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi | … Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Arunima Bishnoi, Advocate FPA-PMLA-2210, 2207, 2211-2214 & 2337-2339/DLI/2018 Page 1 of 3
| Shri Royden Fer Advocate & Shri Advocate |
nandes, Siddhesh Bhole, |
|
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent : |
Shri Rajeev Awas | thi, Advocate |
| FPA-PMLA-2211/DLI/2018 | ||
| Surendra Kumar Choraria | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-2212/DLI/2018 | ||
| Ichu Devi Choraria | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-2213/DLI/2018 Babita Choraria |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-2214/DLI/2018 | ||
| Rajendra Kumar Choraria | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Aakarsh Srivastava, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 11.12.2018
FPA-PMLA-2210, 2207, 2211-2214 & 2337-2339/DLI/2018
The counsel for all the appellants submitted that rejoinder could not be filed as reply is not filed within the time granted by this Tribunal. However, they have no objection if the reply is taken on record. Replies are taken on record. Order is passed accordingly. Let rejoinders be filed within
FPA-PMLA-2210, 2207, 2211-2214 & 2337-2339/DLI/2018
Page 2 of 3
four weeks. Both the parties are also allowed to file the written synopsis by
the next date.
List on 11th April, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi,
11th December, 2018
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-2210, 2207, 2211-2214 & 2337-2339/DLI/2018
Page 3 of 3
M/s. Ahmed Joo Rare Jewels and Others
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Justice Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
