The Appellate Tribunal allowed time for filing a reply and rejoinder in Money Laundering Act appeal MP-PMLA-4269/LKW/2018 and FPA-PMLA-2190/LKW/2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4269/LKW/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2190/LKW/2018 … Appellant
Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Versus
Sushil Kumar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Yash Anand, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 22.03.2018
MP-PMLA-4269/LKW/2018 (COD)
A fresh appeal has been filed u/s 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act-2002 against the Impugned Order Dt. 19th June, 2017. Alongwith the appeal an application for condonation of Delay has been filed. The prayer made in the application is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent and seeks time to file the reply. Let the reply be filed within two weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
List on 25th April, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 22nd March, 2018 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-2190/LKW/2018
Page 1 of 1
Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Sushil Kumar
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
