The Tribunal stayed coercive action under Section 8(4) of the PMLA pending the hearing of the appellant's appeal against an order dated 20th December, 2017, while reserved for a week.
Stay on further coercive action till the next date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4224/MUM/2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2155/MUM/2018 Tirupati Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent |
: | Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA |
: : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| ORDER 15.02.201 |
8 |
FPA-PMLA-2155/MUM/2018
The present appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 20th December, 2017. Learned counsel for the appellant has made his submission for some time. Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, learned counsel for the respondent seeks one week accommodation.
List on 22nd February, 2018.
Till the next date of hearing, no further coercive action shall be taken
in view of the notice under Section 8(4) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
FPA-PMLA-2155/MUM/2018
Page 1 of 2
Copy of the order be given ‘dasti’ to both the parties.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi,
15th February, 2018
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-2155/MUM/2018
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether coercive action should be stayed pending the hearing of the appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tirupati Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
