The Appellate Tribunal directed the appellant to supply affidavit copies of appeals regarding adoption of property and stay applications within one week. The matter was listed for hearing later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4204/LKW/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-4205/ LKW /2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2142/ LKW /2018
Yadav Singh … Appellant MP-PMLA-4206/LKW/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-4207/ LKW /2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2143/ LKW /2018 Smt. Kusum Lata … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Varun Mishra, Proxy Counsel |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: | Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 12.01.2018
FPA-PMLA-2142 & 2143/ LKW /2018
No one appeared on behalf of the appellant when the matter was called. Later, Mr. Varun Mishra, Proxy Counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the copy of the appeals has not been received. The counsel for the appellant is
FPA-PMLA-2142 & 2143/LKW/2018
Page 1 of 2
directed to supply the copy within one week. The appeal has been filed along with an application for condonation of delay.
List on 23rd February, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 12th January, 2018.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-2142 & 2143/LKW/2018
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appeals filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act require admission where the appellant fails to appear subsequently for hearing.
Yadav Singh
Kusum Lata
The Deputy Director
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
