No one appeared for the appellant. The Tribunal was unable to dispose of the appeal and directed the copy of the order be sent to the appellant and his counsel.
None; order to be sent to appellant and counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4120/MUM/2017 COD MP-PMLA-4121/MUM/2017 Stay FPA-PMLA-2112/HYD/2017
K. Ravindranath … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None. For the respondent : None. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 22.01.2018
FPA-PMLA-2112/HYD/2017
No one appears on behalf of the appellant. The copy of the order be
sent to the appellant as well as his counsel.
Re-notify on 25th January, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 22nd January, 2018 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-2112/HYD/2017
Page 1 of 1
K. Ravindranath
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
