The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the money laundering appeal filed under Section 26 of the PMLA, 2002, as it had been withdrawn during its pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4262/DLI/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4018/DLI/2017 (COD) &
FPA-PMLA-2072/DLI/2017
Vijay Kumar Gupta … Appellant Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Kunal Sabhrwal, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : MEMBER |
ORDER 06.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-2072/DLI/2017
The present appeal was filed under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 by Vijay Kumar Gupta against the order dated 25.09.2017. Notice was issued. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant moved an application for withdrawal of the appeal. Copy has been handed over to the learned counsel for the respondent. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 06th April, 2018 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-2072/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Vijay Kumar Gupta
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
