The Appellate Tribunal granted four weeks to the appellant to file a rejoinder after the respondent filed a reply. The parties were allowed to submit written synopses before the next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-3951/LKW/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2040/LKW/2017
Shri Uday Pratap Singh … Appellant/Applicant
2. MP-PMLA-3953/LKW/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2041/LKW/2017
Smt. Neelam Singh … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri P. Chakarvaty Advocate, Adv. For the respondent : Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
10.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-2040 & 2041/LKW/2017
Reply has been filed by the respondent. The counsel for the appellant seeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 17th September, 2018.
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 10th April, 2018 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-2040 & 2041/LKW/2017
Page 1 of 1
Uday Pratap Singh
Neelam Singh
Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
