Listed for further hearing. The court granted the appellant one more opportunity to file a reply within four weeks. The status quo order was maintained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-3927/CHN/2017 (stay) FPA-PMLA-2002/CHN/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Ashok Bajaj | … | Appellant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-3944/CHN/2017 (Exam.) FPA-PMLA-2036/CHN/2017 |
||
| Ashok Bajaj | … | Appellant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-3945/CHN/2017 (Exam.) FPA-PMLA-2037/CHN/2017 |
||
| Ashok Bajaj | … | Appellant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-3946/CHN/2017 (Exam.) FPA-PMLA-2038/CHN/2017 |
||
| Jam Surgical Company Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Shivansh Gupta, Advocate Shri Vijay Aggarwal, Advocate Sh. Muddit Jain, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
10.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-2002,2036,2037& 2038/CHN/2017
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. One more opportunity is granted to file the reply. Let the reply be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
FPA-PMLA-2002,2036,2037,& 2038/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 2
List on 27th August, 2018 .
Status quo order shall continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
10th April, 2018
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-2002,2036,2037,& 2038/CHN/2017
Page 2 of 2
Ashok Bajaj/Jam Surgical Company Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director/Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
MANMOHAN SINGH
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
