The tribunal noted that the Coram was not complete due to the Hon'ble Chairman being busy with an Intellectual Property Appellate Board matter. The matter was re-notified for hearing on 16th October, 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3809/MUM/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1988/ MUM/2017 Satyen Suresh Gathani … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Abhimanyu Walia, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate
ORDER
16.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-1988/CHN/2017
Coram is not complete. Hon’ble Chairman is busy in Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) matter at outstation.
Re-notify on 16th October, 2018.
(V.P. Verma) Registrar
New Delhi, 16th April, 2018 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1988/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 1
Satyen Suresh Gathani
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
