The Tribunal allowed both parties to file written synopsis in the money laundering appeal. The order directed re-notification on 25 September 2018.
Both parties allowed to file written synopsis; re-notification directed on 25 September 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4110/CHN/2017 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-3890/CHN/2017 (STAY) FPA-PMLA-1980/CHN/2017
M/s Gold Quest Enterprises India … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Abhishek Kumar Panday, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 27.08.2018
FPA-PMLA-1980/CHN/2017
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis in view of the
facts involved in the matter.
Re-notify on 25th September, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 27th August, 2018
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1980/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether parties are permitted to file written synopsis in the matter.
Whether the FPA-PMLA case should be re-notified.
M/s Gold Quest Enterprises India
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
MANMOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
