The appellant filed a memo and sought time to file reply. Notice issued. Respondent accepted notice and needed time for reply. Reply deadline set for six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3952/KOL/2017 (Misc) MP-PMLA-3857/KOL/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1960/KOL/2017
Mr. Putul Gagoi … Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : Ms. Sonam N. Kohli, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent |
: Mr. S. K. Sharma, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 07.02.2018
FPA-PMLA-1960/KOL/2017
Amended memo of parties has been filed. Issue notice of the appeal. Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate accepts the notice and seeks time to file the reply.
Let the reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List this appeal on 19th July, 2018.
The learned counsel for the respondent states that no notice u/s 8(4) of PMLA has been issued to the appellant. In any case notice u/s 8(4) has been issued, the appellant would entitle to press the interim order.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra)
Member
New Delhi, 7th February, 2018.
‘S’
FPA-PMLA-1960/KOL/2017
Page 1 of 1
Putul Gagoi
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
