Listing order in an appeal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act allowing filing of reply within four weeks and continuing an interim order until the next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3843/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3844/DLI/2017 (Exm.) FPA-PMLA-1948/DLI/2017
Sh. S.S. Bhatter … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Tanushree Sinha, Advocate
For the respondent : Shri Mohd. Faraz, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
15.03.2018
FPA-PMLA-1948/DLI/2017
Reply has not been filed. Counsel for the respondent seeks some
more time to file the same. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis before the next date of hearing.
List on 8th August, 2018.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 15th March, 2018. ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1948/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Sh. S.S. Bhatter
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
