Twoappellants seeking stay inPrevention of Money Laundering Act adjudications. Thebench granted liberty to file written synopses within two weeks but did not dispose of the matters, leaving the order reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3888/BNG/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1923/BNG/2017 Mrs. Manjula Rau … Appellant & MP-PMLA-3785/BNG/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1916/BNG/2017 Smt. Padmavatamma M V … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Shri Chdauauda URS BG, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 06.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-1923/BNG/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1916/BNG/2017
Both the parties are granted liberty to file the written synopsis within two weeks. Order reserved.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 06th April, 2018 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1923/BNG/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1916/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 1
Mrs. Manjula Rau
Smt. Padmavatamma M V
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
