This order permits the respondent to file a reply within four weeks and sets dates for a rejoinder and synopsis filing; it lists the matter for August 14, 2018.
No substantive decision or legal proposition was delivered in this order; the court allowed time for filing a reply and listed the matter for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3778/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1914/COCHIN/2017
Lenin M.R. … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri M. Gireesh Kumar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 12.03.2018
FPA-PMLA-1914/COCHIN/2017
Mr. S.K. Sharma learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent seeks some more time to file the reply. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter. Both the parties are also allowed to file the written synopsis.
List on 14th August, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 12th March, 2018 ‘A’ FPA-PMLA-1914/COCHIN/2017
Page 1 of 1
Lenin M.R.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
MANMOHAN SINGH
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
