This order was a final listing of eight ongoing proceedings regarding stay petitions. The appellant sought no rejoinder and withdrew the application for stay pending verification of a payment regarding condonation of delay, with the matter listed for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-3725/KOL/2017 (Stay) |
|
|---|---|
| MP-PMLA-3726/KOL/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1894/KOL/2017 |
|
| Rose Valley Hotels & Entertainments Ltd. … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … |
Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-3728/KOL/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3729/KOL/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1895/KOL/2017 |
|
| Rose Valley Industries Ltd. … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … |
Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-3731/KOL/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3732/KOL/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1896/KOL/2017 |
|
| Rose Valley Marketing India Ltd. … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … |
Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-3734/KOL/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3735/KOL/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1897/KOL/2017 |
|
| Rose Valley Project Ltd. … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … |
Respondent |
| (5) MP-PMLA-3737/KOL/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3738/KOL/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1898/KOL/2017 |
|
| Modern Investment Trade Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus |
FPA-PMLA-1894-1901/KOL/2017 Page 1 of 3
| The Joint Director | |
|---|---|
| Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … |
Respondent |
| (6) MP-PMLA-3740/KOL/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3741/KOL/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1899/KOL/2017 |
|
| Chocolate Hotels Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … |
Respondent |
| (7) MP-PMLA-3743/KOL/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3744/KOL/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1900/KOL/2017 |
|
| Brand Value Communications Ltd. … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … |
Respondent |
| (8) MP-PMLA-3746/KOL/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3747/KOL/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1901/KOL/2017 |
|
| Idea Project Ltd. … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … |
Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Sangam Kumar Proxy Counsel |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate along with Sanjana Rajput, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : MEMBER |
ORDER
11.07.2018
FPA-PMLA-1894 to 1901/KOL/2017
The learned Proxy Counsel for the appellant states that they do not
wish to file any rejoinder. The Proxy Counsel states that the case may be
FPA-PMLA-1894-1901/KOL/2017 Page 2 of 3
taken up for final hearing as they do not wish to pursue the stay petition also. The learned Counsel for the appellant stated that their Condonation of Delay has been allowed with cost. She would, however, verify the payment of the same before the next date of hearing. Respondent to also verify the same.
The learned Counsel for the respondent states that all the documents have not been supplied to them as directed by the Bench earlier although according to the appellant they have supplied the same. In case the same has not been supplied, another set be supplied to the respondent.
List on 9th October, 2018.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 11th July, 2018.
‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1894-1901/KOL/2017 Page 3 of 3
Rose Valley Hotels & Entertainments Ltd.
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Rose Valley Industries Ltd.
Rose Valley Marketing India Ltd.
Rose Valley Project Ltd.
Modern Investment Trade Pvt. Ltd.
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
