Listing order allowing parties to file sequels. The case was remanded to the lower court with incident of stay but the higher court itself has not decided the case.
Time granted for filing the rejoinder within three weeks and parties allowed to file written synopsis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3828/HYD/2017 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-3709/HYD/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1889/HYD/2017
Neel Sundar Tharad … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Kotla Harshavardhan, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Mohammad Faraz, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
23.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-1889/HYD/2017, MP-PMLA-3828/HYD/2017 (A.D.) & MPPMLA-3709/HYD/2017 (Stay)
Replies have been filed by the respondent. Counsel for the appellant
seeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the rejoinder be filed within three weeks.
List on 9th July, 2018.
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next
date.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 23rd April, 2018
‘D’
FPA-PMLA-1889/HYD/2017
Page 1 of 1
Neel Sundar Tharad
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
