The Tribunal listed the money laundering FPA matters on 6th April 2018 after the respondent filed a reply. The court allowed both parties to file written synopses by the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| FPA-PMLA-1881/LKW/2017 Sh. Jambu Prasad Jain |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| FPA-PMLA-1882/LKW/2017 | ||
| Smt. Reetu Jain | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1883/LKW/2017 |
||
| Smt. Swati Jain | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1884/LKW/2017 | ||
| Sh. Sanjay Jain | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1886/LKW/2017 | ||
| Sh. Pankaj Jain | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1892/LKW/2017 | ||
| ICICI Bank Limited | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3750/LKW/2017 Stay | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1902/LKW/2017 | ||
| Naresh Kumar Garg & Anr | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3750/LKW/2017 Stay | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1903/LKW/2017 | ||
| NKG Infrastructure and Anr. | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3756/LKW/2017 Stay | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1904/LKW/2017 | ||
| Vinod Kumar Goel | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3757/LKW/2017 Stay FPA-PMLA-1905/LKW/2017 |
||
| Tirupati Construction | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1906/LKW/2017 | ||
| Parminder Kumar Tyagi | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Parmatma Singh, Advocate Shri Amaresh Kumar, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : MEMBER |
FPA-PMLA-1881-1884/LKW/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1886, 1892 & 1902-1906/LKW/2017
Page 1 of 2
ORDER 12.01.2018
FPA-PMLA-1881-1884/LKW/2017 and FPA-PMLA-1886, 1892 & 1902-1906/LKW/2017
Reply is not on record. The counsel for the respondent states that the reply is ready and he would be filing the same in the registry during the course of the day. The counsel for the appellant submits that as per record no counter report to the IIT report or any expert opinion is available. The copy of the reply has been served to the counsel for the appellant who does not want to file the rejoinder. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
List on 6th April, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 12th January, 2018.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1881-1884/LKW/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1886, 1892 & 1902-1906/LKW/2017
Page 2 of 2
Jambu Prasad Jain
Reetu Jain
Swati Jain
Sanjay Jain
Pankaj Jain
ICICI Bank Limited
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
