Thin interlocutory order directing the respondent to examine documents submitted by the appellant regarding mortgaged properties; interim order continued pending future date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3629/JP/2017 (U.A.) MP-PMLA-3630/JP/2017 (stay) FPA-PMLA 1853/JP/2017
Regional Office, Syndicate Bank, Jaipur … Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri A.B. Dval, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Suwati Anand, Adv. |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 18.10.2018 FPA-PMLA 1853/JP/2017
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed copy of the documents in order to show that most of the properties have been mortgaged with the Bank. Copy of the same has been handed over to the counsel for the respondent, who seeks time to examine the documents.
List on 4th January, 2018.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 18th October, 2018 ‘s’ FPA-PMLA-1853/JP/2017
Page 1 of 1
Regional Office, Syndicate Bank, Jaipur
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Justice Manmohan Singh
Shri G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
