List order regarding adjournment request and notice for further hearing of two forfeiture proceedings without substantive disposition or reasoning.
Adjournment granted in forfeiture proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act due to personal difficulty of the arguing counsel. No substantive decision or legal proposition is provided in this single-page order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-337/LKW/2011 (SP) FPA-PMLA-185/LKW/2011 M/s. Khalari Cement Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent & 2. FPA-PMLA-189/LKW/2011 M/s. Smridhi Sponge Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Devesh Poddar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
04.10.2018
FPA-PMLA-185/LKW/2011 & FPA-PMLA-189/LKW/2011
Mr. Devesh Poddar submits that the arguing counsel appearing on
behalf of the appellants is in personal difficulty. An adjournment is sought which is not opposed.
List on 07th February, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 04th October, 2018 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-185/LKW/2011 & FPA-PMLA-189/LKW/2011
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Khalari Cement Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
M/s. Smridhi Sponge Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
MANMOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
